Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Precisely Why I Never Accept "At Least They're Reading" As An Argument

"A word about beginning readers. We strongly object to the Goosebumps and Spinechillers books, as well as to Sweet Valley High and other lightweight romance series directed at young readers. 'At least they're reading,' parents sigh. But these books are the literary equivalent of TV cartoons. Just because your child develops a taste for cartoons doesn't mean that he'll then go on to watch National Geographic specials. The cartoons train him to pay attention in five-second bursts and teach him that he doesn't need to think in a connected series of propositions because bursts of images will work just as well. In the same way, Goosebumps and Sweet Valley High books develop a child's taste for short sentences, simple sentence structure, easy vocabulary, uncomplicated paragraphs, and shallow, simple plots. This won't help him make the transition to decent literature; it may teach him to turn away from anything that makes his brain work too hard. A diet of Goosebumps does not promote the patterns of thought that produce intellectual and personal excellence."

- The Well-Trained Mind by Susan Wise Bauer and Jessie Wise, p62.

Of course, we have a better example than Sweet Valley High and Goosebumps nowadays...

No comments: